01 / The workflow
A proposed tool starts with the work that keeps returning.
Explore how a fictional radiology source note could be organized into five draft fields for clinician review.
How the handoff can look today
- 01
A source note describes an exam and its available details in plain text.
- 02
A draft structure separates those details into exam, indication, technique, findings, and impression.
- 03
Information missing from the source stays marked as not provided for a clinician to review.
Intended result
A structured starting point for a radiology report draft, with missing details left explicit and clinician review required.
02 / Example structure
Context, kept together.
Illustrative sample output
This static, fictional example shows one possible organization of a source note. It is not generated output, a validated report, or clinical guidance.
Illustrative input
FICTIONAL SAMPLE ONLY. Chest radiograph, two views. Source note: lungs are described as clear; heart size is described as normal; no comparison is supplied.
- Exam
- Chest radiograph.
- Indication
- Not provided in the fictional source note.
- Technique
- Two views, as stated in the fictional source note.
- Findings
- The fictional source note describes the lungs as clear and the heart size as normal.
- Impression
- Not provided in the fictional source note.
04 / Questions
Before you join.
05 / Stay informed
A simple signal of interest helps Tallyfen understand which repeated workflows matter.
Register interest in radiology workflows
Join Tallyfen’s waitlist if organizing radiology reporting work is relevant to your team.
The shared waitlist records your email only; it does not mark a specific workflow or promise access, availability, or a release date.